50% - 3 reviews |
Sort by: Latest / Earliest / Upvotes / Downvotes
![]() |
rated: |
factatom posted on September 30, 2019 21:50:46
I could see $HBAR has a real good team, which makes it a good project. It is true that it could handle a lot of transactions per minute (allegedly 10k) without burning too much electricity or staking coins (lot's of it). Cons are: it is a centralized coin, it appears to concentrate more on the environmental side, but lacks the true purpose of blockchain, which is to bring power to the people.
Click here to see more...
![]() |
rated: |
Crypto Anonymous posted on September 23, 2019 22:26:41
Someone described this as we should see the level of centralization in this project as a baby that gets nourished by its parents until it's grown up and can stand on its own feet. However I do not believe this would be an appropriate analogy, as I highly doubt if the real goal of this project would ever be to become fully open source, permissionless and decentralized, which are the only ways in
![]() |
rated: |
mistergrin posted on September 23, 2019 14:27:15
Hashgraph is a project that I have followed since their initial announcement in 2018. They use DAG-technology, much like IOTA/Nano. Specifically they utilize Proof of Stake, gossip about gossip, and other techniques to get super fast transaction speeds (10,000+ TPS) for their network. They are not a "blockchain" per-se. They also have a top notch technical team with people like Leemon Baird
Get a weekly update on the best and worst projects right in your inbox.